Gapped text

The canal path was quieter than the main roads, and that quiet made the details loud. A cyclist rang her bell twice, a delivery van reversed with a soft alarm, and a man in an orange jacket swept leaves into neat piles that the wind immediately undid. I slowed down, and, as I did so, a strange thing happened: the city stopped feeling like a series of tasks and started feeling like a story. Moreover, because I wasn’t checking my screen every minute, I began to remember what I saw, not just where I was meant to be.

That reasoning worked—until it didn’t. The bridge spat me out into a maze of small warehouses, all roller doors and identical fences, where even the street names seemed to repeat. For a few minutes I felt the familiar irritation rising, the urge to pull out my phone and demand certainty. Nevertheless, I stayed with the discomfort and looked for clues: the direction of traffic noise, the angle of the sun between buildings, and a distant church tower that rose above the roofs like a bookmark.

This was when I remembered an old piece of advice from a hiking instructor: choose a ‘handrail’, a feature you can keep beside you as you move. In a city, that could be a river, a tram line, or even a long park. I decided to use the canal that cuts through the eastern districts, because it was unlikely to disappear and it roughly paralleled my destination. Consequently, instead of heading straight for the office, I aimed for the water, telling myself that one clear decision was better than a dozen anxious guesses.

Using that tower as a reference point, I threaded my way back to familiar streets, and the relief I felt was surprisingly physical. Yet the more interesting outcome was what happened next: I began recognising places I had ‘seen’ before but never really registered. A mural under a flyover, a bakery that vented warm air onto the pavement, a tiny library in an old phone box—these were not new additions. They were simply details that had been invisible when my focus was narrowed to arrival times and the fastest route.

Halfway along, I passed a café with fogged windows and a chalkboard sign that read, ‘Lost? Come in.’ It was probably a joke aimed at tourists, yet it felt uncomfortably accurate. Inside, while I waited for a coffee, I listened to two builders debating the quickest route to a site across town, each insisting on a different set of back streets. Their argument wasn’t about technology at all; it was about experience, about which corners they trusted. That, I realised, was what my phone had replaced: not knowledge, but confidence.

At first, I tried to compensate by following other people, which seemed sensible until I realised they were commuting with the same tunnel-vision I usually had. They moved quickly, eyes forward, headphones in, and the city became a corridor rather than a place. Nevertheless, I copied them for a few blocks, hoping that a familiar landmark would appear and rescue me from uncertainty. When it didn’t, I stopped pretending and began looking properly—up at street signs, across shop fronts, and along side roads I had previously ignored.

Later that week, I decided to lean into the experiment by hiring a bicycle and letting the city carry me at speed, trusting the navigation app to whisper directions through my earbuds. It was, admittedly, a relief: the turns arrived precisely when promised, and I could glide past junctions without the awkward pauses of indecision. Yet the route felt strangely private, as if it had been designed for me alone, cutting through service roads and back entrances that most people never see. By the time I locked the bike outside my flat, I realised I couldn’t recall a single street name I’d travelled on, only the calm certainty of having been guided.