Summarize Written Text

As schools and universities move more of their materials online, a practical question has become pressing: do people understand what they read as well on a screen as on paper? A growing body of research suggests that, for some kinds of reading, the answer is no. When readers are tested on long informational texts, those who read on paper tend to score slightly better than those who read the same text on a screen, particularly when they are working under time pressure. Interestingly, the difference does not appear for short texts or for stories, and it does not seem to have narrowed over time, even though younger readers have grown up using digital devices. Researchers have offered several explanations. Screen reading is often associated with quick, shallow activities such as checking messages, and readers may carry this skimming habit over to more demanding material. Scrolling may also make it harder to form a mental map of where information appears in a text, something that the fixed pages of a book support. In addition, people reading on screens tend to be overconfident, believing they have understood more than they actually have, and therefore spend less time on difficult passages. These findings do not mean that digital texts should be abandoned, since they are cheaper, easier to update and more accessible to many readers. Instead, they suggest that students should be taught to slow down when reading on screens and that paper may remain the better choice for complex material that must be studied closely.